IFA Firm Insight: How long until we have a similar situation to the IFAs in Australia?

Will this lead to an increase in IFA retirement within the UK? Read on and see what you think....

 $4.7 billion has been returned to clients 

Following the Australian Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation, and Financial Services Industry, several financial institutions in Australia have been required to compensate clients for misconduct and inappropriate financial advice provided by IFAs and other financial advisers 4.7 billion has been returned to clients due to annual reviews not taking place and/or not documented, and this figure is predicted to rise significantly. These compensations are part of the remediation efforts aimed at rectifying the harm caused to consumers

IFA Breaking Point

The Australian Royal Commission created additional pressures on the industry, with IFAs in Australia having to deal with regulatory changes, increased scrutiny and monitoring, and a greater emphasis on compliance and documentation.  Coping with this, and the damage to industry reputation caused by the Commission, alongside maintaining a high level of service to their clients, means a lot of Australian IFAs are closing to breaking point

What do Australian IFAs have to deal with?

• Regulatory Changes: Higher education and professional standards for financial advisers have been introduced. IFAs must meet these new requirements within specified timeframes, adding pressure to upgrade their qualifications and adapt to the changes
• Compliance and Documentation: The regulatory changes have also increased the compliance burden on IFAs. They are required to maintain comprehensive documentation, records, and evidence to demonstrate compliance with regulatory standards. This includes providing detailed advice documents, disclosure statements, and fee disclosure notices to clients
• Increased Scrutiny and Monitoring: Following the Royal Commission, there has been increased scrutiny and monitoring of financial advisers and their practices by regulatory authorities such as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). This means IFAs are subject to more extensive reviews, audits, and investigations to ensure compliance with regulations and ethical standards. The additional scrutiny can create extra pressure and administrative burden on IFAs
• Industry Reputation: The revelations and misconduct uncovered by the Royal Commission have significantly impacted the reputation of the financial advisory industry in Australia. This has led to a loss of trust from clients and the wider public. IFAs may face additional pressures to restore trust and rebuild their reputation through transparent practices, ethical conduct, and delivering positive client outcomes
• Transition to Fee-for-Service Model: The shift away from commission-based remuneration to a fee-for-service model, mandated by the regulatory reforms, has posed challenges for IFAs. They have had to restructure their business models, review pricing structures, and communicate the value of their services to clients. Adjusting to the new fee arrangements and managing client expectations during the transition can be demanding

What does this mean for us in the UK and how is this similar to Consumer Duty?

The Royal Commission in Australia and the Consumer Duty in the UK are two separate initiatives, but there are some similarities in their objectives and focus on consumer protection within the financial industry

• Consumer Protection: Both the Royal Commission in Australia and the Consumer Duty in the UK aim to enhance consumer protection and ensure that individuals receive fair treatment when dealing with financial institutions and advisers
• Misconduct Investigation: The Royal Commission in Australia was established to investigate misconduct and unethical practices in the banking, superannuation, and financial services industry. Similarly, the Consumer Duty in the UK is part of the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) broader efforts to tackle misconduct and improve outcomes for consumers
• Accountability and Transparency: Both initiatives emphasise the need for greater accountability and transparency from financial institutions. They seek to address issues such as conflicts of interest, inappropriate advice, lack of disclosure, and other practices that may harm consumers
• Regulatory Reforms: The findings of the Royal Commission in Australia led to significant regulatory reforms, including changes in legislation and the establishment of stronger enforcement mechanisms. Similarly, the Consumer Duty in the UK is expected to result in regulatory reforms and requirements that financial firms must adhere to in order to meet their obligations towards consumers
• Industry Practices: Both initiatives aim to drive positive changes in industry practices to ensure that the financial sector operates in the best interests of consumers. They promote the adoption of ethical standards, responsible lending practices, and fair treatment of customers

Where do we go from here?

While there are similarities between the two initiatives, it's important to note that they are specific to the respective countries and their unique financial regulatory environments. The Royal Commission in Australia was a comprehensive inquiry with broad implications across various sectors, while the Consumer Duty in the UK is a specific regulatory measure introduced by the FCA to strengthen consumer protection within the financial industry 

Financial regulations and consumer protection measures are continually evolving and improving worldwide. Hopefully, the UK can learn from Australia and use Consumer Duty to enhance transparency and accountability, thereby mitigating the potential for misconduct. The implementation of timely investor safeguards can protect and improve the interests of both clients and IFAs

With the figure of 3.8 billion, according to Veteran bank analyst Brett Le Mesurier from Shaw and Partners, set to “rise significantly from the $3.8 billion already forked out by the banks”, the UK hopes to learn from Australia, before we have a mass exodus of retiring IFAs.

With all that being said, with the UK and Australia signing a free trade agreement in December 2021, is Consumer Duty a precursor to Australian Royal Commission?

If you have any questions regarding this blog, or would like to explore your financial retirement further and in more depth contact www.truestarlegacy.co.uk or email info@truestartalent.co.uk

Truestar Legacy is a division of Truestar Talent: We are with you every step of the way